linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fscrypt: support trusted keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:00:40 +0200
From:   Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fscrypt: support trusted keys

Hello Jarkko,

On 09.08.21 11:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:09:28PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Kernel trusted keys don't require userspace knowledge of the raw key
>> material and instead export a sealed blob, which can be persisted to
>> unencrypted storage. Userspace can then load this blob into the kernel,
>> where it's unsealed and from there on usable for kernel crypto.
>>
>> This is incompatible with fscrypt, where userspace is supposed to supply
>> the raw key material. For TPMs, a work around is to do key unsealing in
>> userspace, but this may not be feasible for other trusted key backends.
>>
>> Make it possible to benefit from both fscrypt and trusted key sealing
>> by extending fscrypt_add_key_arg::key_id to hold either the ID of a
>> fscrypt-provisioning or a trusted key.
>>
>> A non fscrypt-provisioning key_id was so far prohibited, so additionally
>> allowing trusted keys won't break backwards compatibility.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>> ---
>> Tested with:
>> https://github.com/google/fscryptctl/pull/23
>> -	if (key->type != &key_type_fscrypt_provisioning)
>> -		goto bad_key;
>> -	payload = key->payload.data[0];
>> +	if (key->type == &key_type_fscrypt_provisioning) {
> 
> Why does fscrypt have own key type, and does not extend 'encrypted' with a
> new format [*]?

See the commit[1] adding it for more information. TL;DR:

fscrypt maintainers would've preferred keys to be associated with
a "domain". So an encrypted key generated for fscrypt use couldn't be reused
for e.g. dm-crypt. They are wary of fscrypt users being more exposed if their
keys can be used with weaker ciphers via other kernel functionality that could
be used to extract information about the raw key material.

Eric also mentioned dislike of the possibility of rooting encrypted keys to
user keys. v2 is only restricted to v2, so we didn't discuss this further.

Restricting the key to fscrypt-only precludes this reuse.

My commit makes no attempts in changing that. It just adds a new way to pass
raw key material into fscrypt. For more information, see the commit[1] adding
that key type.

> [*] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.13/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.html

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=93edd392ca

Cheers,
Ahmad

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |