[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57619a74-8292-64c6-0dbb-2f01de281652@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:02:45 +0200
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fscrypt: support trusted keys
On 09.08.21 12:00, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Jarkko,
>
> On 09.08.21 11:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:09:28PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>> Kernel trusted keys don't require userspace knowledge of the raw key
>>> material and instead export a sealed blob, which can be persisted to
>>> unencrypted storage. Userspace can then load this blob into the kernel,
>>> where it's unsealed and from there on usable for kernel crypto.
>>>
>>> This is incompatible with fscrypt, where userspace is supposed to supply
>>> the raw key material. For TPMs, a work around is to do key unsealing in
>>> userspace, but this may not be feasible for other trusted key backends.
>>>
>>> Make it possible to benefit from both fscrypt and trusted key sealing
>>> by extending fscrypt_add_key_arg::key_id to hold either the ID of a
>>> fscrypt-provisioning or a trusted key.
>>>
>>> A non fscrypt-provisioning key_id was so far prohibited, so additionally
>>> allowing trusted keys won't break backwards compatibility.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> Tested with:
>>> https://github.com/google/fscryptctl/pull/23
>>> - if (key->type != &key_type_fscrypt_provisioning)
>>> - goto bad_key;
>>> - payload = key->payload.data[0];
>>> + if (key->type == &key_type_fscrypt_provisioning) {
>>
>> Why does fscrypt have own key type, and does not extend 'encrypted' with a
>> new format [*]?
>
> See the commit[1] adding it for more information. TL;DR:
>
> fscrypt maintainers would've preferred keys to be associated with
> a "domain". So an encrypted key generated for fscrypt use couldn't be reused
> for e.g. dm-crypt. They are wary of fscrypt users being more exposed if their
> keys can be used with weaker ciphers via other kernel functionality that could
> be used to extract information about the raw key material.
>
> Eric also mentioned dislike of the possibility of rooting encrypted keys to
> user keys. v2 is only restricted to v2, so we didn't discuss this further.
Typo: v2 (of my series) is only restricted to s/v2/trusted keys/
>
> Restricting the key to fscrypt-only precludes this reuse.
>
> My commit makes no attempts in changing that. It just adds a new way to pass
> raw key material into fscrypt. For more information, see the commit[1] adding
> that key type.
>
>> [*] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.13/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.html
>
> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=93edd392ca
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists