linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:05:59 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel
 tree

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right
> thing with regards to adding the S-o-b.

fd.o server rejects any pushes that haven't been done by dim, so how did
this get through? Matt, can you pls figure out and type up the patch to
plug that hole?

Thanks, Daniel

> 
> Regards, Joonas
> 
> Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-07-15 07:18:54)
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch