[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRE2RwQ6XlUqbgmn@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:05:59 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel
tree
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right
> thing with regards to adding the S-o-b.
fd.o server rejects any pushes that haven't been done by dim, so how did
this get through? Matt, can you pls figure out and type up the patch to
plug that hole?
Thanks, Daniel
>
> Regards, Joonas
>
> Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-07-15 07:18:54)
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Commit
> >
> > db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids")
> >
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists