linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:19:39 -0700
From:   Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel
 tree

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right
> > thing with regards to adding the S-o-b.
> 
> fd.o server rejects any pushes that haven't been done by dim, so how did
> this get through?

I definitely used dim for all of these patches, but I'm not sure how I
lost my s-o-b on this one.  Maybe when I edited the commit message after
'dim extract-tags' I accidentally deleted an extra line when I removed
the extract-tags marker?  It's the only patch where the line is missing,
so it's almost certainly human error on my part rather than something
dim did wrong.

> Matt, can you pls figure out and type up the patch to
> plug that hole?

Are you referring to a patch for dim here?  The i915 patch has already
landed, so we can't change its commit message now.


Matt

> 
> Thanks, Daniel
> 
> > 
> > Regards, Joonas
> > 
> > Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-07-15 07:18:54)
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Commit
> > > 
> > >   db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids")
> > > 
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795