linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] misc: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRI5l+T1o3QXZ9Lo@ninjato>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:32:23 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] misc: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling

Hi Andy,

> Nope. Below is the compile-tested one:

Well, then let's add this incrementally once it has actually been
tested.

> > I don't understand the first sentence. And we still need it to clean up?
> 
> If you know the name of the folder, you may look up it, no need to keep a
> variable for that.

I need the dentry twice, subdirs are also created in there. Of course, I
could look it up twice, but why the computation? The variable seems
simpler to me, despite it being static. Or is it a debugfs rule to not
save dentries?

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)