lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:40:08 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] misc: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:32:23AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > Nope. Below is the compile-tested one: > > Well, then let's add this incrementally once it has actually been > tested. I have no strong opinion here, I just considered that ACPI code is good to have as well. > > > I don't understand the first sentence. And we still need it to clean up? > > > > If you know the name of the folder, you may look up it, no need to keep a > > variable for that. > > I need the dentry twice, subdirs are also created in there. Of course, I > could look it up twice, but why the computation? The variable seems > simpler to me, despite it being static. Or is it a debugfs rule to not > save dentries? I think the best person to ask is Greg :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists