[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8726aff8-f7d0-d4e0-ed59-aeffc2a4c2f5@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:59:31 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Don't reset dr6 unconditionally when the vcpu
being scheduled out
On 09/08/21 18:54, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Not directly related to this patch, but why does KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD exist?
> Commit ae561edeb421 ("KVM: x86: DR0-DR3 are not clear on reset") added it to
> ensure DR0-3 are fresh when they're modified through non-standard paths, but I
> don't see any reason why the new values_must_ be loaded into hardware. eff_db
> needs to be updated, but I don't see why hardware DRs need to be updated unless
> hardware breakpoints are active or DR exiting is disabled, and in those cases
> updating hardware is handled by KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT and KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED.
The original implementation of KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT (by yours truly)
had a bug where it did not call kvm_update_dr7 and thus
KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED was not set correctly. I agree that commit
70e4da7a8ff6 ("KVM: x86: fix root cause for missed hardware
breakpoints") should have gotten rid of KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD altogether.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists