linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 0/5] Move devlink_register to be near devlink_reload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <cover.1628599239.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:37:30 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...lanox.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Move devlink_register to be near devlink_reload_enable

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>

Hi Dave and Jakub,

This series prepares code to remove devlink_reload_enable/_disable API
and in order to do, we move all devlink_register() calls to be right
before devlink_reload_enable().

The best place for such a call should be right before exiting from
the probe().

This is done because devlink_register() opens devlink netlink to the
users and gives them a venue to issue commands before initialization
is finished.

1. Some drivers were aware of such "functionality" and tried to protect
themselves with extra locks, state machines and devlink_reload_enable().
Let's assume that it worked for them, but I'm personally skeptical about
it.

2. Some drivers copied that pattern, but without locks and state
machines. That protected them from reload flows, but not from any _set_
routines.

3. And all other drivers simply didn't understand the implications of early
devlink_register() and can be seen as "broken".

In this series, we focus on items #1 and #2.

Please share your opinion if I should change ALL other drivers to make
sure that devlink_register() is the last command or leave them in an
as-is state.

Thanks

Leon Romanovsky (5):
  net: hns3: remove always exist devlink pointer check
  net/mlx4: Move devlink_register to be the last initialization command
  mlxsw: core: Refactor code to publish devlink ops when device is ready
  net/mlx5: Accept devlink user input after driver initialization
    complete
  netdevsim: Delay user access till probe is finished

 .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_devlink.c     |  8 +---
 .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_devlink.c   |  8 +---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c     | 38 +++++++++++++------
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 10 +----
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c    | 13 ++++++-
 .../mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/dev/driver.c        | 12 +++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c    | 27 +++++++------
 drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c                   | 19 +++++-----
 8 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1