[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRN+8u59lJ6MWsOL@rric.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:40:34 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/edac/edac_mc: Remove all strcpy() uses
On 10.08.21 08:02:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 16:36 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 09.08.21 10:18:58, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > strscpy and scnprintf have different return values and it's simpler
> > > and much more common to use scnprintf for appended strings that are
> > > limited to a specific buffer length.
> >
> > Calculating the bytes written from the return value is a oneliner.
>
> Not really.
> You still have to test for strscpy's possible return of -E2BIG.
I thought of:
num = strscpy(p, OTHER_LABEL, len);
num = num < 0 ? len : num;
len -= num;
p += num;
Clearly, this does not look nice, esp. if this is repeated in the
code. That's why I prefer the strlen(p) implementation:
strscpy(p, OTHER_LABEL, len);
len -= strlen(p);
p += strlen(p);
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists