[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB6800F6169275A323DE0FD782E6F89@VI1PR04MB6800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:05:06 +0000
From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To: Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>,
"srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org" <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 1/4] bindings: nvmem: introduce "reverse-data" property
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: 2021年8月10日 23:14
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>;
> srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org; robh+dt@...nel.org; shawnguo@...nel.org
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> kernel@...gutronix.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/4] bindings: nvmem: introduce "reverse-data"
> property
>
> On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 15:35 +0800, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > Introduce "reverse-data" property for nvmem provider to reverse buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
> > index b8dc3d2b6e92..bc745083fc64 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
> > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ patternProperties:
> > description:
> > Size in bit within the address range specified by reg.
> >
> > + reverse-data:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > + description:
> > + Reverse the data that read from the storage device.
>
> I'd prefer if it was more explicit that the *bytes* will be reversed. Otherwise a
> reader might think that this is reversing on the *bit* level.
Make sense, how about 'reverse-byte-order'?
Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> Jan
>
> > +
> > required:
> > - reg
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. |
> |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pe
> ngutronix.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zhang%40nxp.com%7C79
> 3a60188540455919b608d95c118878%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0%7C0%7C637642052637994749%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWI
> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1
> 000&sdata=S27O8AV8lRvGxyEutJl6Uh4AjbArD%2BkvQl%2FI05ZU1P8%3D
> &reserved=0 |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:
> +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists