[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c4cb6e9-2ca9-9738-9706-28ff94f8fdcc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:35:33 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Check memory add/cap ordering
On 11.08.21 10:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> For memblock_cap_memory_range() to work properly, it should be called
> after memory is detected and added to memblock with memblock_add() or
> memblock_add_node(). If memblock_cap_memory_range() would be called
> before memory is registered, we may silently corrupt memory later
> because the crash kernel will see all memory as available.
>
> Print a warning and bail out if ordering is not satisfied.
>
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 57a9849a5d820c34..e2ca8ddc8ebebf4e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1685,6 +1685,11 @@ void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> if (!size)
> return;
>
> + if (memblock.memory.cnt <= 1) {
> + pr_warn("%s: No memory registered yet\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size,
> &start_rgn, &end_rgn);
> if (ret)
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists