[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1628762462.y419h5w2nx.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 20:01:08 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
fthain@...ux-m68k.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, userm57@...oo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/interrupt: Do not call single_step_exception()
from other exceptions
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of August 11, 2021 2:13 am:
> single_step_exception() is called by emulate_single_step() which
> is called from (at least) alignment exception() handler and
> program_check_exception() handler.
>
> Redefine it as a regular __single_step_exception() which is called
> by both single_step_exception() handler and emulate_single_step()
> function.
>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> Fixes: 3a96570ffceb ("powerpc: convert interrupt handlers to use wrappers")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index dfbce527c98e..d56254f05e17 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(RunModeException)
> _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_UNK, 0);
> }
>
> -DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(single_step_exception)
> +static void __single_step_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> clear_single_step(regs);
> clear_br_trace(regs);
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,11 @@ DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(single_step_exception)
> _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_TRACE, regs->nip);
> }
>
> +DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(single_step_exception)
> +{
> + __single_step_exception(regs);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * After we have successfully emulated an instruction, we have to
> * check if the instruction was being single-stepped, and if so,
> @@ -1130,7 +1135,7 @@ DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER(single_step_exception)
> static void emulate_single_step(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> if (single_stepping(regs))
> - single_step_exception(regs);
> + __single_step_exception(regs);
> }
>
> static inline int __parse_fpscr(unsigned long fpscr)
> --
> 2.25.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists