linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: timer: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay SoC Timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3128F143273F060C33DCA9C8F1F99@BYAPR11MB3128.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:49:13 +0000
From:   "Sanil, Shruthi" <shruthi.sanil@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kris.pan@...ux.intel.com" <kris.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Thokala, Srikanth" <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>,
        "Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai" 
        <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: timer: Add bindings for Intel Keem
 Bay SoC Timer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 1:08 PM
> To: Sanil, Shruthi <shruthi.sanil@...el.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; daniel.lezcano@...aro.org;
> tglx@...utronix.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com;
> kris.pan@...ux.intel.com; mgross@...ux.intel.com; Thokala, Srikanth
> <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
> <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: timer: Add bindings for Intel Keem
> Bay SoC Timer
> 
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:35 AM Sanil, Shruthi <shruthi.sanil@...el.com>
> wrote:
> > > From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 4:14 AM
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +properties:
> > >
> > > You need a 'compatible' here. Otherwise, how does one know what 'reg'
> > > contains. Also, without it, this schema will never be applied.
> > >
> >
> > This is a parent block that has the common configuration register address
> defined which we would need during the initialization of the child nodes. This
> block in itself is not doing anything. We have this because, we have a
> common register that is required to be accessed during all the timers and
> counter initialization.
> > The child nodes have the compatible string, which is used in the driver. I
> have validated this on the Keem Bay HW and see that the timer probes are
> being called and the timers are functional as expected.
> 
> I think I understand now. The problem is that the current state of affairs with
> this block is incorrect software representation. What you need is to create an
> MFD device driver (for which the compatible will exactly the one Rob is telling
> about) and from it you register the rest of your drivers. The existing drivers
> for this block should be converted to MFD schema.

Sure Andy, I shall check on this and get back.
Thank You!

> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko