[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRYuHW8q5Zd+hvH5@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:32:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
bristot@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, guodong.xu@...aro.org,
jianpeng.ma@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, linuxarm@...wei.com,
peterz@...radead.org, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com, rafael@...nel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, sbrivio@...hat.com,
tangchengchang@...wei.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
valentin.schneider@....com, yangyicong@...wei.com,
yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] use bin_attribute to break the size limitation of
cpumap ABI
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 04:44:26PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > V9:
> > - Split bitmask and list APIs and removed bool parameter with respect to
> > Greg's comment
> > - Removed duplication in code doc
> >
> ...
> >
> > Background:
> >
> > the whole story began from this thread when Jonatah and me tried to add a
> > new topology level-cluster which exists on kunpeng920 and X86 Jacobsville:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YFRGIedW1fUlnmi+@kroah.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YFR2kwakbcGiI37w@kroah.com/
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
> Will you take this series so that I can rebase the cluster-scheduler series[1] on top of
> this? that cluster series is where this ABI series really get started. I am looking forward
> to sending a normal patchset for cluster series after this ABI series settles down.
>
> [1] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210420001844.9116-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com/
Now applied to my testing tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists