[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <974f50588528f046b98963f6978a13ba4d98b157.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 11:59:29 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/sev: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 797146e0cd6b..94c089e9ea69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -97,11 +97,6 @@ static inline void mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void) { }
extern char __start_bss_decrypted[], __end_bss_decrypted[], __start_bss_decrypted_unused[];
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
-{
- return sme_me_mask;
-}
-
static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
{
return sme_me_mask;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists