[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522000b97adcfbc581e7e5ed1afc94519b1388b8.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 07:33:48 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc5-rt8
On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 12:56 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 15:18 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> >
> > Sebastian, et al,
> >
> > Got the following panic running v5.14-rc5-rt8:
> >
> > ...
>
> > Config is attached.
> >
> > I was running the rteval script that kicks off parallel kernel builds
> > and hackbench runs as loads and runs cyclictest with a thread on each
> > core:
> >
> > $ sudo rteval --duration=10m
>
> It took my box more than 10 minutes to explode, but with all those
> debug options turned on, it did manage to do so in fairly short order.
>
> Off to build a fixed up 5.13-rt...
...and it reproduced. Transplanted 5.12-rt slub seems stable in both
5.1[34]-rt trees FWIW.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists