[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94d74c8a-1e10-2500-468a-11c0ae7e2417@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:28:44 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc5-rt8
On 8/14/21 7:33 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 12:56 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 15:18 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> Sebastian, et al,
>>>
>>> Got the following panic running v5.14-rc5-rt8:
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>>> Config is attached.
>>>
>>> I was running the rteval script that kicks off parallel kernel builds
>>> and hackbench runs as loads and runs cyclictest with a thread on each
>>> core:
>>>
>>> $ sudo rteval --duration=10m
>>
>> It took my box more than 10 minutes to explode, but with all those
>> debug options turned on, it did manage to do so in fairly short order.
>>
>> Off to build a fixed up 5.13-rt...
>
> ...and it reproduced. Transplanted 5.12-rt slub seems stable in both
> 5.1[34]-rt trees FWIW.
Why didn't you see it in earlier testing though? What's different now.
> -Mike
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists