linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] configfs fix for Linux 5.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eca7f963-7ee1-d062-8020-a2a32a69a9e6@acm.org>
Date:   Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:25:35 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs fix for Linux 5.14

On 8/14/21 9:27 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 9:00 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> configfs fix for Linux 5.14
>>
>>  - fix to revert to the historic write behavior (Bart Van Assche)
> 
> It would have been lovely to see what the problem was, but the commit
> doesn't actually explain that.
> 
> I suspect it's this
> 
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/26/581
> 
> but there might have been more.

Hi Linus,

Bodo explained to me via a private email that the historic behavior is
the behavior he needs for a patch that he is still working on. I'm not
aware of any existing user space software that relies on the historic
(non-POSIX) behavior of configfs writes.

Bart.