linux-kernel - Re: IIO, dmabuf, io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0a336c0-ae2f-e77f-3c5f-51fdb3fc51fe@amd.com>
Date:   Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:02:02 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Subject: Re: IIO, dmabuf, io_uring

Hi Paul,

Am 13.08.21 um 13:41 schrieb Paul Cercueil:
> Hi,
>
> A few months ago we (ADI) tried to upstream the interface we use with 
> our high-speed ADCs and DACs. It is a system with custom ioctls on the 
> iio device node to dequeue and enqueue buffers (allocated with 
> dma_alloc_coherent), that can then be mmap'd by userspace 
> applications. Anyway, it was ultimately denied entry [1]; this API was 
> okay in ~2014 when it was designed but it feels like re-inventing the 
> wheel in 2021.
>
> Back to the drawing table, and we'd like to design something that we 
> can actually upstream. This high-speed interface looks awfully similar 
> to DMABUF, so we may try to implement a DMABUF interface for IIO, 
> unless someone has a better idea.

Yeah, that sounds a lot like a DMABUF use case.

>
> Our first usecase is, we want userspace applications to be able to 
> dequeue buffers of samples (from ADCs), and/or enqueue buffers of 
> samples (for DACs), and to be able to manipulate them (mmapped 
> buffers). With a DMABUF interface, I guess the userspace application 
> would dequeue a dma buffer from the driver, mmap it, read/write the 
> data, unmap it, then enqueue it to the IIO driver again so that it can 
> be disposed of. Does that sound sane?

Well it's pretty close. Doing the map/unmap dance all the time is 
usually a bad idea since flushing the CPU TLB all the time totally kills 
your performance.

What you do instead is to implement the CPU synchronize callbacks in 
your DMA-BUF implementation and flush caches as necessary.

>
> Our second usecase is - and that's where things get tricky - to be 
> able to stream the samples to another computer for processing, over 
> Ethernet or USB. Our typical setup is a high-speed ADC/DAC on a dev 
> board with a FPGA and a weak soft-core or low-power CPU; processing 
> the data in-situ is not an option. Copying the data from one buffer to 
> another is not an option either (way too slow), so we absolutely want 
> zero-copy.
>
> Usual userspace zero-copy techniques (vmsplice+splice, MSG_ZEROCOPY 
> etc) don't really work with mmapped kernel buffers allocated for DMA 
> [2] and/or have a huge overhead, so the way I see it, we would also 
> need DMABUF support in both the Ethernet stack and USB (functionfs) 
> stack. However, as far as I understood, DMABUF is mostly a DRM/V4L2 
> thing, so I am really not sure we have the right idea here.

Well two possibilities here: Either implement DMA-BUF support in the 
Ethernet/USB subsystem or get splice working efficiently with DMA-BUF 
mappings.

The first one is certainly a lot of work and no idea if the second is 
even doable and if yes also in a non-hacky way which you can get upstream.

>
> And finally, there is the new kid in town, io_uring. I am not very 
> literate about the topic, but it does not seem to be able to handle 
> DMA buffers (yet?). The idea that we could dequeue a buffer of samples 
> from the IIO device and send it over the network in one single syscall 
> is appealing, though.

As far as I know this is orthogonal to DMA-BUF. Christoph's answer 
sounds like my understand is correct, but there are certainly people 
which know that better than I do.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Any thoughts? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
> [1]: 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flinux-iio%2F20210217073638.21681-1-alexandru.ardelean%40analog.com%2FT%2F%23m6b853addb77959c55e078fbb06828db33d4bf3d7&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C2c62025e34b644b98e2508d95e4f4dcb%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637644516997743314%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=vZfslxljjWcXi1RccZcsnKTD8x1CixRN%2Ftk4FMsWN3U%3D&amp;reserved=0
> [2]: 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewbedev.com%2Fzero-copy-user-space-tcp-send-of-dma-mmap-coherent-mapped-memory&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C2c62025e34b644b98e2508d95e4f4dcb%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637644516997753306%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Fn%2B3dO%2B%2F3r0ZpC5oKsQaPN2DREZKVWdVPahYgt2bsSw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>