Message-Id: <1YDXXQ.FDQ4R2DPJ42F@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:20:25 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Subject: Re: IIO, dmabuf, io_uring

Hi,

Le ven., août 13 2021 at 18:20:19 +0100, Pavel Begunkov 
<asml.silence@...il.com> a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On 8/13/21 12:41 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>  Hi,
>> 
>>  A few months ago we (ADI) tried to upstream the interface we use 
>> with our high-speed ADCs and DACs. It is a system with custom ioctls 
>> on the iio device node to dequeue and enqueue buffers (allocated 
>> with dma_alloc_coherent), that can then be mmap'd by userspace 
>> applications. Anyway, it was ultimately denied entry [1]; this API 
>> was okay in ~2014 when it was designed but it feels like 
>> re-inventing the wheel in 2021.
>> 
>>  Back to the drawing table, and we'd like to design something that 
>> we can actually upstream. This high-speed interface looks awfully 
>> similar to DMABUF, so we may try to implement a DMABUF interface for 
>> IIO, unless someone has a better idea.
>> 
>>  Our first usecase is, we want userspace applications to be able to 
>> dequeue buffers of samples (from ADCs), and/or enqueue buffers of 
>> samples (for DACs), and to be able to manipulate them (mmapped 
>> buffers). With a DMABUF interface, I guess the userspace application 
>> would dequeue a dma buffer from the driver, mmap it, read/write the 
>> data, unmap it, then enqueue it to the IIO driver again so that it 
>> can be disposed of. Does that sound sane?
>> 
>>  Our second usecase is - and that's where things get tricky - to be 
>> able to stream the samples to another computer for processing, over 
>> Ethernet or USB. Our typical setup is a high-speed ADC/DAC on a dev 
>> board with a FPGA and a weak soft-core or low-power CPU; processing 
>> the data in-situ is not an option. Copying the data from one buffer 
>> to another is not an option either (way too slow), so we absolutely 
>> want zero-copy.
>> 
>>  Usual userspace zero-copy techniques (vmsplice+splice, MSG_ZEROCOPY 
>> etc) don't really work with mmapped kernel buffers allocated for DMA 
>> [2] and/or have a huge overhead, so the way I see it, we would also 
>> need DMABUF support in both the Ethernet stack and USB (functionfs) 
>> stack. However, as far as I understood, DMABUF is mostly a DRM/V4L2 
>> thing, so I am really not sure we have the right idea here.
>> 
>>  And finally, there is the new kid in town, io_uring. I am not very 
>> literate about the topic, but it does not seem to be able to handle 
>> DMA buffers (yet?). The idea that we could dequeue a buffer of 
>> samples from the IIO device and send it over the network in one 
>> single syscall is appealing, though.
> 
> You might be interested to look up zctap, previously a.k.a netgpu.

CCing Jonathan (Lemon) then.

Jonathan: Am I right that zctap supports importing/exporting dmabufs? 
Because that would solve half of my problem.

Cheers,
-Paul

> For io_uring, it's work in progress as well.
> 
>> 
>>  Any thoughts? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>>  Cheers,
>>  -Paul
>> 
>>  [1]: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20210217073638.21681-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/T/#m6b853addb77959c55e078fbb06828db33d4bf3d7
>>  [2]: 
>> https://newbedev.com/zero-copy-user-space-tcp-send-of-dma-mmap-coherent-mapped-memory
> 
> --
> Pavel Begunkov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists