linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: Remove the polling code to read a NCI frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:41:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     bongsu.jeon2@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: Remove the polling code to read a
 NCI frame

On 16/08/2021 06:05, bongsu.jeon2@...il.com wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
> 
> Because the virtual NCI device uses Wait Queue, the virtual device
> application doesn't need to poll the NCI frame.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c | 33 +++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 

This depends on the patch 1/3 (the NCI change) so should go via the same
tree probably (or cross tree merge). Looks good to me:


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof