linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use command queue batching helpers to improve performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:41:47 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use command queue batching helpers
 to improve performance



On 2021/8/16 16:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:47:58PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/8/16 15:24, John Garry wrote:
>>>> In addition, I find that function arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd() can also be optimized
>>>> slightly, three useless instructions can be reduced.
>>>
>>> I think that you could optimise further by pre-building commonly used commands.
>>>
>>> For example, CMD_SYNC without MSI polling is always the same. And then only different in 1 field for MSI polling.
>>>
>>> But you need to check if the performance gain is worth the change.
>>
>> Good advice. I can give it a try.
> 
> Please send it as a new patch on top. I've queued the old one and sent
> it to Joerg. Since this is just further cleanup, it can be done separately.

OK, I'll post a separate patch later.

> 
> Will
> .
>