[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e28020c5-3da3-c721-96df-9a115f105bf7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:14:35 +0200
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, Roy Sun <Roy.Sun@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jack Zhang <Jack.Zhang1@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/scheduler: Add fence deadline support
Am 07.08.21 um 20:37 schrieb Rob Clark:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> As the finished fence is the one that is exposed to userspace, and
> therefore the one that other operations, like atomic update, would
> block on, we need to propagate the deadline from from the finished
> fence to the actual hw fence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 3 +++
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> index 69de2c76731f..f389dca44185 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,30 @@ static void drm_sched_fence_release_finished(struct dma_fence *f)
> dma_fence_put(&fence->scheduled);
> }
>
> +static void drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished(struct dma_fence *f,
> + ktime_t deadline)
> +{
> + struct drm_sched_fence *fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fence->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* If we already have an earlier deadline, keep it: */
> + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags) &&
> + ktime_before(fence->deadline, deadline)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + fence->deadline = deadline;
> + set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (fence->parent)
> + dma_fence_set_deadline(fence->parent, deadline);
> +}
> +
> static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled = {
> .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name,
> .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name,
> @@ -138,6 +162,7 @@ static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_finished = {
> .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name,
> .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name,
> .release = drm_sched_fence_release_finished,
> + .set_deadline = drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished,
> };
>
> struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index a2a953693b45..3ab0900d3596 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -818,6 +818,9 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param)
>
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
> s_fence->parent = dma_fence_get(fence);
> + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT,
> + &s_fence->finished.flags))
> + dma_fence_set_deadline(fence, s_fence->deadline);
Maybe move this into a dma_sched_fence_set_parent() function.
Apart from that looks good to me.
Regards,
Christian.
> r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
> drm_sched_job_done_cb);
> if (r == -ENOENT)
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index d18af49fd009..0f08ade614ae 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,12 @@ struct drm_sched_fence {
> */
> struct dma_fence finished;
>
> + /**
> + * @deadline: deadline set on &drm_sched_fence.finished which
> + * potentially needs to be propagated to &drm_sched_fence.parent
> + */
> + ktime_t deadline;
> +
> /**
> * @parent: the fence returned by &drm_sched_backend_ops.run_job
> * when scheduling the job on hardware. We signal the
Powered by blists - more mailing lists