[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QVz3W1E0D4i9iVTpkHVaB_Y9u1_HK2VW+FoQKJ9H8krrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:21:45 +0800
From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: sun8i-ce: fix multiple memory leaks in sun8i_ce_hash_run
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 6:43 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:40:20PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> >
> > I agree with you and would like to modify "return 0" to "return err"
> > in the next version. Even if the parent function does not care about
> > the return value, it is still necessary to keep the right return
> > value.
>
> Well if the parent is ignoring the error then returning the error
> there obviously isn't going to help.
If so, do I still need to change my current patch?
Dongliang Mu
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists