[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFcVECJXhjQLZdfQm8n_0cLsuh6CFPJbSA4A5XXQL+6+okb+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:46:49 +0530
From: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org,
steen.hegelund@...rochip.com, bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com,
ioana.ciornei@....com, likaige@...ngson.cn,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mscc: Add RGMII RX and TX delay tuning
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review and sorry I din't reply earlier.
<snip>
> > +- vsc8531,rx-delay : RGMII RX delay. Allowed values are defined in
>
> 'vsc8531' is not a vendor. The form is <vendor>,<propname>.
I was just aligning it with existing optional property names in this document.
Could you please let me know if mscc,rx-delay is more appropriate?
Regards,
Harini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists