lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210818190125.GE197200@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:01:25 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+9b57a46bf1801ce2a2ca@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in hid_submit_ctrl/usb_submit_urb

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:14:23AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    794c7931a242 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/..
> git tree:       upstream

Dmitry:

Why does syzbot persist in reporting useless names like "upstream" for 
the git tree being tested?  How is anyone supposed to know what that 
actually refers to?  Why doesn't it put the real name (maybe with 
"upstream" in parentheses as an additional comment)?

Furthermore, the last time I tried to submit a test patch with something 
like "#syz test: upstream 794c7931a242", it didn't work because syzbot 
itself didn't recognize the repository name!

This should already be fixed -- I can't remember when I first reported 
the problem but it must have been at least two years ago.  

If there isn't already a change request pending for this issue, can you 
add one?

Thanks,

Alan Stern

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ