[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG3jFysiY-w1wXcA=qpjbTKF=2N3tjOND+SvwcLr7b_UZhepGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:02:23 +0200
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>,
Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: anx7625: Propagate errors from sp_tx_edid_read()
Thanks Sam!
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 19:40, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 07:13:18PM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> > During the sp_tx_edid_read() call the return value of sp_tx_edid_read()
> > is ignored, which could cause potential errors to go unhandled.
> >
> > All errors which are returned by sp_tx_edid_read() are handled in
> > anx7625_get_edid().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > index ea414cd349b5c..abc8db77bfd36 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > @@ -845,8 +845,11 @@ static int sp_tx_edid_read(struct anx7625_data *ctx,
> > if (g_edid_break == 1)
> > break;
> >
> > - segments_edid_read(ctx, count / 2,
> > - pblock_buf, offset);
> > + ret = segments_edid_read(ctx, count / 2,
> > + pblock_buf, offset);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> This could be just "if (ret)".
> Same goes for the next case.
>
> With or without this simplification:
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>
> I assume you will apply the patches.
Applied to drm-misc-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists