linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] MT8195 SMI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a160afd-ceeb-04a3-8213-fe781ec18e30@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:41:40 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
        anan.sun@...iatek.com, ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com,
        yi.kuo@...iatek.com, anthony.huang@...iatek.com,
        Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] MT8195 SMI support

On 10/08/2021 10:08, Yong Wu wrote:
> This patchset mainly adds SMI support for mt8195.
> 
> Comparing with the previous version, add two new functions:
> a) add smi sub common
> b) add initial setting for smi-common and smi-larb.
> 
> Change note:
> v3:1) In the dt-binding:
>        a. Change mediatek,smi type from phandle-array to phandle from Rob.
>        b. Add a new bool property (mediatek,smi_sub_common)
>           to indicate if this is smi-sub-common.
>    2) Change the clock using bulk parting.
>       keep the smi-common's has_gals flag. more strict.
>    3) More comment about larb initial setting.
>    4) Add a maintain patch

The patchset looks good to me but I saw now comments from Rob, so I
expect a resend. Therefore there is also time for additional review -
maybe continued by Ikjoon Jang?

If you sent a v4 with fixes rather soon and get ack from Rob, I could
still try to get it into next merge window. After this weekend I won't
be taking patches for this cycle and it will wait for the merge window
to finish.


Best regards,
Krzysztof