[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f4c25b27f347a1ae0e2941ab3e3584730a9970a.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 05:34:34 +0000
From: Yong Wu (吴勇) <Yong.Wu@...iatek.com>
To: "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com"
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"tfiga@...omium.org" <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Youlin Pei (裴友林)
<youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
Yi Kuo (郭懿) <Yi.Kuo@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Anan Sun (孙安安) <Anan.Sun@...iatek.com>,
Anthony Huang (黃建嘉)
<Anthony.Huang@...iatek.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"ikjn@...omium.org" <ikjn@...omium.org>,
Ming-Fan Chen (陳明汎)
<Ming-Fan.Chen@...iatek.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] MT8195 SMI support
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 22:41 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/08/2021 10:08, Yong Wu wrote:
> > This patchset mainly adds SMI support for mt8195.
> >
> > Comparing with the previous version, add two new functions:
> > a) add smi sub common
> > b) add initial setting for smi-common and smi-larb.
> >
> > Change note:
> > v3:1) In the dt-binding:
> > a. Change mediatek,smi type from phandle-array to phandle
> > from Rob.
> > b. Add a new bool property (mediatek,smi_sub_common)
> > to indicate if this is smi-sub-common.
> > 2) Change the clock using bulk parting.
> > keep the smi-common's has_gals flag. more strict.
> > 3) More comment about larb initial setting.
> > 4) Add a maintain patch
>
> The patchset looks good to me but I saw now comments from Rob, so I
> expect a resend. Therefore there is also time for additional review -
> maybe continued by Ikjoon Jang?
>
> If you sent a v4 with fixes rather soon and get ack from Rob, I could
> still try to get it into next merge window. After this weekend I
> won't
> be taking patches for this cycle and it will wait for the merge
> window
> to finish.
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks very much for your information.
It looks the time is too short to get Rob's ack in this weekend. I will
wait for one or two weeks to see if there is other comments, then
resend.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists