[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210818075316.GB501393@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 07:53:17 +0000
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"osalvador@...e.de" <osalvador@...e.de>,
"tdmackey@...tter.com" <tdmackey@...tter.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: hwpoison: don't drop slab caches for offlining
non-LRU page
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:24:01AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
...
>
> Might we want to add a TODO in the code? We have a similar one in
> mm/page_isolation.c:set_migratetype_isolate() and it's certainly a reminder
> that something of value is missing.
Yes, that will be helpful. The below's what's in my mind, but if someone
has better idea, that's fine.
@@ -296,11 +296,9 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access)
}
/*
- * Only call shrink_node_slabs here (which would also shrink
- * other caches) if access is not potentially fatal.
+ * TODO: Could shrink slab caches here if a lightweight range-based
+ * shrinker will be available.
*/
- if (access)
- drop_slab_node(page_to_nid(p));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);
- Naoya Horiguchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists