[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0082d37-dd36-5d83-f759-cf05a9e00b77@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:55:22 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"osalvador@...e.de" <osalvador@...e.de>,
"tdmackey@...tter.com" <tdmackey@...tter.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: hwpoison: don't drop slab caches for offlining
non-LRU page
On 18.08.21 09:53, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:24:01AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Might we want to add a TODO in the code? We have a similar one in
>> mm/page_isolation.c:set_migratetype_isolate() and it's certainly a reminder
>> that something of value is missing.
>
> Yes, that will be helpful. The below's what's in my mind, but if someone
> has better idea, that's fine.
>
> @@ -296,11 +296,9 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Only call shrink_node_slabs here (which would also shrink
> - * other caches) if access is not potentially fatal.
> + * TODO: Could shrink slab caches here if a lightweight range-based
> + * shrinker will be available.
> */
> - if (access)
> - drop_slab_node(page_to_nid(p));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);
Just what I had in mind, thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists