linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210819175807.GC1721383@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:58:07 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cohuck@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler
 function pointer

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:54:33AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:

> Nope.  The only requests for merges through my tree that I'm aware of
> were [1] and what I understand was the evolution of that here now [2].
> Maybe you're thinking of [3], which I do see in mainline where this was
> 2/2 in that series but afaict only patch 1/2 was committed.  I guess
> that explains why there was no respin based on comments for this patch.
> Thanks,

Tony,

If you take Alex's tree from here:

https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commits/next

And rebase + repost exactly the patches you need applied it would be
helpful.

Jason