| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210820074236.2zli4nje7bof62rh@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:42:36 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rcutorture: Avoid problematic critical section nesting on
PREEMPT_RT
From: "From: Scott Wood" <swood@...hat.com>
rcutorture is generating some nesting scenarios that are not compatible on PREEMPT_RT.
For example:
preempt_disable();
rcu_read_lock_bh();
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
The problem here is that on PREEMPT_RT the bottom halves have to be
disabled and enabled in preemptible context.
Reorder locking: start with BH locking and continue with then with
disabling preemption or interrupts. In the unlocking do it reverse by
first enabling interrupts and preemption and BH at the very end.
Ensure that on PREEMPT_RT BH locking remains unchanged if in
non-preemptible context.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190911165729.11178-6-swood@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210819182035.GF4126399@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
[bigeasy: Drop ATOM_BH, make it only about changing BH in atomic
context. Allow enabling RCU in IRQ-off section. Reword commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
v1…v2:
- Drop the ATOM_BH* bits. There don't seem to be needed, Paul did not
ant the preempt-disable around enabling/disabling BH as it might fix
things that RCU should take care.
- Allow enabling RCU with disabled interrupts on RT. Scott confirmed
that it was needed but might no longer be needed. Paul said that it
might have been required at some point. It survived multiple 6h long
TREE01 and TREE06 testing.
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 40ef5417d9545..d2ef535530b10 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1432,28 +1432,34 @@ static void rcutorture_one_extend(int *readstate, int newstate,
/* First, put new protection in place to avoid critical-section gap. */
if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH)
local_bh_disable();
+ if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH)
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ)
local_irq_disable();
if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT)
preempt_disable();
- if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH)
- rcu_read_lock_bh();
if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED)
rcu_read_lock_sched();
if (statesnew & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU)
idxnew = cur_ops->readlock() << RCUTORTURE_RDR_SHIFT;
- /* Next, remove old protection, irq first due to bh conflict. */
+ /*
+ * Next, remove old protection, in decreasing order of strength
+ * to avoid unlock paths that aren't safe in the stronger
+ * context. Namely: BH can not be enabled with disabled interrupts.
+ * Additionally PREEMPT_RT requires that BH is enabled in preemptible
+ * context.
+ */
if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ)
local_irq_enable();
- if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH)
- local_bh_enable();
if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT)
preempt_enable();
- if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH)
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED)
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH)
+ local_bh_enable();
+ if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH)
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
if (statesold & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU) {
bool lockit = !statesnew && !(torture_random(trsp) & 0xffff);
@@ -1496,6 +1502,9 @@ rcutorture_extend_mask(int oldmask, struct torture_random_state *trsp)
int mask = rcutorture_extend_mask_max();
unsigned long randmask1 = torture_random(trsp) >> 8;
unsigned long randmask2 = randmask1 >> 3;
+ unsigned long preempts = RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT | RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED;
+ unsigned long preempts_irq = preempts | RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ;
+ unsigned long bhs = RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH | RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH;
WARN_ON_ONCE(mask >> RCUTORTURE_RDR_SHIFT);
/* Mostly only one bit (need preemption!), sometimes lots of bits. */
@@ -1503,11 +1512,26 @@ rcutorture_extend_mask(int oldmask, struct torture_random_state *trsp)
mask = mask & randmask2;
else
mask = mask & (1 << (randmask2 % RCUTORTURE_RDR_NBITS));
- /* Can't enable bh w/irq disabled. */
- if ((mask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ) &&
- ((!(mask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH) && (oldmask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH)) ||
- (!(mask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH) && (oldmask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH))))
- mask |= RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH | RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH;
+
+ /*
+ * Can't enable bh w/irq disabled.
+ */
+ if (mask & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ)
+ mask |= oldmask & bhs;
+
+ /*
+ * Ideally these sequences would be detected in debug builds
+ * (regardless of RT), but until then don't stop testing
+ * them on non-RT.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+ /* Can't modify BH in atomic context */
+ if (oldmask & preempts_irq)
+ mask &= ~bhs;
+ if ((oldmask | mask) & preempts_irq)
+ mask |= oldmask & bhs;
+ }
+
return mask ?: RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU;
}
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists