[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210820074949.1946576-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:49:49 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
<vdumpa@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix missing unlock on error in arm_smmu_device_group()
Add the missing unlock before return from function arm_smmu_device_group()
in the error handling case.
Fixes: b1a1347912a7 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu_group creation")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index 73893180ec7e..4bc75c4ce402 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1478,8 +1478,10 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
- group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
+ group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group) {
+ mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
group = smmu->s2crs[idx].group;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists