[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210820104111.GC17267@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:41:11 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>, joro@...tes.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, vdumpa@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix missing unlock on error in
arm_smmu_device_group()
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:49:49PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Add the missing unlock before return from function arm_smmu_device_group()
> in the error handling case.
>
> Fixes: b1a1347912a7 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu_group creation")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 73893180ec7e..4bc75c4ce402 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1478,8 +1478,10 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
> mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
> for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
> if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
> - group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
> + group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group) {
> + mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
Urgh, I should really have spotted that in review. Thanks:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Joerg -- please can you throw this on top?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists