linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/x86: Intel platform driver code movement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:12:03 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Kate Hsuan <hpa@...hat.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com, Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
        Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
        David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>,
        Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>,
        Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>,
        Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/x86: Intel platform driver code
 movement

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:46:14PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 8/19/21 6:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This is v4 of the Intel drivers move on in the source tree.
> > v3 has been done by Kate:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210819033001.20136-1-hpa@redhat.com/
> > 
> > I have taken the initial set from review-hans branch and removed Hans' SoB
> > along with Link, while leaving others' tags.
> > 
> > Changelog v4:
> > - spelled fully the driver names in the commit messages
> > - fixed SCU *.ko module names
> 
> Actually I checked this during review and
> CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_IPC, CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_PCI and CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_WDT
> are booleans, iow if enabled they are always builtin so the
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/scu/Makefile from v3 was correct.
> 
> Since the v3 Makefile is more simple I prefer that version,
> but if you prefer to keep the v4 version that is fine too.

I prefer mine, but we need to fix what kbuild bot complained about.

> > - dropped extra prefix in PMC files
> > - dropped stray changes within the series
> > - removed confusing comments in Makefile and Kconfig files
> > - embedded a few of Kconfig improvements here and there (ordering, spelling)
> > - split miscellaneous group
> > - added a patch to fix kernel doc issue in SCU IPC code
> 
> Thanks, I've not (re)reviewed things, but this all sounds good.
> 
> > So, I have noticed the report about SCU and taking into account IPS
> > header deferred move, I think those two should be excluded from the
> > series and sent after rc1, it will also eliminate trampoline move for
> > IPS header, since we may send one patch which includes DRM changes.
> > 
> > Hans, what do you think?
> 
> Fixing the SCU thing will require coordination with / an 
> ack from the MFD maintainer (Lee) so yeah dropping that for
> now and doing the SCU move next cycle is probably the best.
> 
> Dropping the IPS move for now is fine with me too.
> 
> Can you send a v5 with those 2 patches dropped ?

Yes.

> We can still fix the SCU doc, just in the old place...

And yes, definitely.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko