[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162946831024.25758.4994395897895383919.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:05:10 -0000
From: "irqchip-bot for Chen-Yu Tsai" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@...omium.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix priority comparison
when non-secure priorities are used
The following commit has been merged into the irq/irqchip-next branch of irqchip:
Commit-ID: 8d474deaba2c4dd33a5e2f5be82e6798ffa6b8a5
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms/8d474deaba2c4dd33a5e2f5be82e6798ffa6b8a5
Author: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:15:05 +08:00
Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:03:01 +01:00
irqchip/gic-v3: Fix priority comparison when non-secure priorities are used
When non-secure priorities are used, compared to the raw priority set,
the value read back from RPR is also right-shifted by one and the
highest bit set.
Add a macro to do the modifications to the raw priority when doing the
comparison against the RPR value. This corrects the pseudo-NMI behavior
when non-secure priorities in the GIC are used. Tested on 5.10 with
the "IPI as pseudo-NMI" series [1] applied on MT8195.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1604317487-14543-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org/
Fixes: 336780590990 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Support pseudo-NMIs when SCR_EL3.FIQ == 0")
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
[maz: Added comment contributed by Alex]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811171505.1502090-1-wenst@chromium.org
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index e0f4deb..3e61210 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -100,6 +100,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_pmr_sync);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
+/*
+ * When the Non-secure world has access to group 0 interrupts (as a
+ * consequence of SCR_EL3.FIQ == 0), reading the ICC_RPR_EL1 register will
+ * return the Distributor's view of the interrupt priority.
+ *
+ * When GIC security is enabled (GICD_CTLR.DS == 0), the interrupt priority
+ * written by software is moved to the Non-secure range by the Distributor.
+ *
+ * If both are true (which is when gic_nonsecure_priorities gets enabled),
+ * we need to shift down the priority programmed by software to match it
+ * against the value returned by ICC_RPR_EL1.
+ */
+#define GICD_INT_RPR_PRI(priority) \
+ ({ \
+ u32 __priority = (priority); \
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&gic_nonsecure_priorities)) \
+ __priority = 0x80 | (__priority >> 1); \
+ \
+ __priority; \
+ })
+
/* ppi_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having ppi[n + 16] set as NMI */
static refcount_t *ppi_nmi_refs;
@@ -687,7 +708,7 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
return;
if (gic_supports_nmi() &&
- unlikely(gic_read_rpr() == GICD_INT_NMI_PRI)) {
+ unlikely(gic_read_rpr() == GICD_INT_RPR_PRI(GICD_INT_NMI_PRI))) {
gic_handle_nmi(irqnr, regs);
return;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists