[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1318459eaab436aacb225982c49c4b4@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:49:22 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Jeff Layton' <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"w@....eu" <w@....eu>, "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: warn about impending deprecation of mandatory
locks
From: Jeff Layton
> Sent: 20 August 2021 14:57
>
> We've had CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING since 2015 and a lot of distros
> have disabled it. Warn the stragglers that still use "-o mand" that
> we'll be dropping support for that mount option.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/namespace.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index ab4174a3c802..ffab0bb1e649 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -1716,8 +1716,16 @@ static inline bool may_mount(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING
> +static bool warned_mand;
> static inline bool may_mandlock(void)
> {
> + if (!warned_mand) {
> + warned_mand = true;
> + pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> + pr_warn("WARNING: the mand mount option is being deprecated and\n");
> + pr_warn(" will be removed in v5.15!\n");
> + pr_warn("======================================================\n");
> + }
> return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
> }
If that is called more than once you don't want the 'inline'.
I doubt it matters is not inlined - hardly a hot path.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists