[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210821084151.GC3555@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 10:41:51 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH devicetree 1/2] MIPS: mscc: ocelot: disable all switch
ports by default
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:04:15PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The ocelot switch driver used to ignore ports which do not have a
> phy-handle property and not probe those, but this is not quite ok since
> it is valid to not have a phy-handle property if there is a fixed-link.
>
> It seems that checking for a phy-handle was a proxy for the proper check
> which is for the status, but that doesn't make a lot of sense, since the
> ocelot driver already iterates using for_each_available_child_of_node
> which skips the disabled ports, so I have no idea.
>
> Anyway, a widespread pattern in device trees is for a SoC dtsi to
> disable by default all hardware, and let board dts files enable what is
> used. So let's do that and enable only the ports with a phy-handle in
> the pcb120 and pcb123 device tree files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---
> arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb120.dts | 8 ++++++++
> arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists