linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] staging: r8188eu: Use usb_control_msg_recv/send() in usbctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <69bbb80c-2b30-28b9-ad8c-6862a6c3b911@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:11:52 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] staging: r8188eu: Use usb_control_msg_recv/send() in
 usbctrl_vendorreq()

On 8/23/21 2:02 AM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Replace usb_control_msg() with the new usb_control_msg_recv() and
> usb_control_msg_send() API of USB Core.
> 
> This patch is an RFC for different reasons:
> 
> 1) I'm not sure if it is needed: while Greg Kroah-Hartman suggested to
> use the new API in a message to a thread that was about a series of patches
> submitted by Pavel Skripkin (who decided to not use it), I cannot explain
> if and why the driver would benefit from this patch.
> 2) I have doubts about the sematic of the API I use here, so I'd like to
> know whether or not I'm using them properly.
> 3) At the moment I cannot test the driver because I don't have my device
> with me.
> 4) This patch could probably lead to a slight change in some lines of
> Pavel's series (for sure in usb_read*()).
> 
> I'd like to hear from the Maintainers and other interested people if this
> patch is worth to be considered and, in this case, if there are suggestions
> for the purpose to improve it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
> index 6a0a24acf292..9e290c1cc449 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
>   	struct adapter	*adapt = pintfhdl->padapter;
>   	struct dvobj_priv  *dvobjpriv = adapter_to_dvobj(adapt);
>   	struct usb_device *udev = dvobjpriv->pusbdev;
> -	unsigned int pipe;
> +	u8 pipe;
>   	int status = 0;
>   	u8 reqtype;

I think, we can pass REALTEK_USB_VENQT_{READ,WRITE} directly as 
requesttype argument and get rid of u8 reqtype. + we can define these 
macros:

#define
usbctrl_vendor_read(...)   usbctrl_vendorreq(...,REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ)


#define
usbctrl_vendor_write()    usbctrl_vendorreq(...,REALTEK_USB_VENQT_WRITE)


This will make code more nice, IMO  :)


(Sorry for this formatting, my email client disabled "paste without 
formatting" option)

>   	u8 *pIo_buf;
> @@ -47,19 +47,20 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
>   		memset(pIo_buf, 0, len);
>   
>   		if (requesttype == 0x01) {
> -			pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(udev, 0);/* read_in */
>   			reqtype =  REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ;
> +			status = usb_control_msg_recv(udev, pipe, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
> +						      reqtype, value, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX,
> +						      pIo_buf, len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT,
> +						      GFP_KERNEL);
>   		} else {
> -			pipe = usb_sndctrlpipe(udev, 0);/* write_out */
>   			reqtype =  REALTEK_USB_VENQT_WRITE;
> -			memcpy(pIo_buf, pdata, len);

I guess, this memcpy is needed, since we want to send data from pdata


> +			status = usb_control_msg_send(udev, pipe, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
> +						      reqtype, value, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX,
> +						      pIo_buf, len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT,
> +						      GFP_KERNEL);
>   		}
>   
> -		status = usb_control_msg(udev, pipe, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
> -					 reqtype, value, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX,
> -					 pIo_buf, len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT);
> -
> -		if (status == len) {   /*  Success this control transfer. */
> +		if (!status) {   /*  Success this control transfer. */
>   			rtw_reset_continual_urb_error(dvobjpriv);
>   			if (requesttype == 0x01)
>   				memcpy(pdata, pIo_buf,  len);
> 


With regards,
Pavel Skripkin