linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:57:40 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain


On 2021/8/23 17:05, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:19:23AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2021/8/18 6:27, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:46:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>> Patch 1 and 2 make some cleanup, and patch 3 use of_irq_get() instead of
>>>> irq_of_parse_and_map() to get irq number, return -EPROBE_DEFER if the irq
>>>> domain is not yet created, amba_device_add() will properly to handle the
>>>> no IRQ domain issue via deferred probe.
>>>>
>>>> Kefeng Wang (3):
>>>>     amba: Drop unused functions about APB/AHB devices add
>>>>     Revert "ARM: amba: make use of -1 IRQs warn"
>>>>     amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/amba/bus.c       | 100 ++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>>    drivers/of/platform.c    |   6 +--
>>>>    include/linux/amba/bus.h |  18 -------
>>>>    3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Thanks Rob.
>>
>> Hi Russell, should I send the patches to the ARM patch system?
> Yes please - I'll try to squeeze it in for this cycle but it's getting
> a tad late for that. Thanks.

Done, but the sequence of patches is reordered at ARM patch system, 
(using git send-email

and deliver patch1/2/3 in order).

BTW,  could you give me some direction the following patchset[1] too if 
you have time, I have

addressed your comments and resend, but there's been no new feedback for 
a long time.

If it is too late for this cycle, I could resend them after 5.15-rc1.

Many thanks.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210610123556.171328-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/



>