[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9411d418-567b-78f0-0e4d-30f08371c55a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:40:41 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: openat2: Fix testing failure for O_LARGEFILE
flag
Hi Shuah,
On 2021/7/28 20:32, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> When running the openat2 test suite on ARM64 platform, we got below
>> failure,
>> since the definition of the O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. So we can
>> set the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64 to fix this issue.
>
> Sorry, I forgot to copy the failure log:
>
> # openat2 unexpectedly returned #
> 3['/lkp/benchmarks/kernel_selftests/tools/testing/selftests/openat2']
> with 208000 (!= 208000)
> not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails
> with -22 (Invalid argument)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Could you apply this patch if no objection from your side? Thanks.
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
>> index d7ec1e7..1bddbe9 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
>> * XXX: This is wrong on {mips, parisc, powerpc, sparc}.
>> */
>> #undef O_LARGEFILE
>> +#ifdef __aarch64__
>> +#define O_LARGEFILE 0x20000
>> +#else
>> #define O_LARGEFILE 0x8000
>> +#endif
>> struct open_how_ext {
>> struct open_how inner;
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists