[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnPMjY5iKaz+ch14Syc_=n2+xiTrBEK020XwkHGJQQWJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:51:40 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/26] x86/fpu/xstate: Use feature disable (XFD) to
protect dynamic user state
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 2:09 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> What relevance does the fact have for userspace whether the kernel
> supports XFD or not?
Right.
If user space needs to know that XFD exists, then we have done
something very wrong.
--
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists