linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add clock controller ID headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U1zARov=8q9ZSOS4BRe919uFLJh56b8WKk-9LF0r5KZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:52:14 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add clock controller ID headers

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 5:43 PM Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Add the GPUCC, DISPCC and VIDEOCC clock headers which were dropped
> earlier.
>
> Fixes: 422a295221bb ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add clock controller nodes")

IMO drop the "Fixes". To me having the "Fixes" there means that there
was a bug in the old patch. This isn't really fixing a bug.

> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Other than removing the "Fixes" then this seems like it would be nice
to land soon after the next -rc1 comes out so that patches that start
referring to the clocks in these controllers can take advantage of
them. Snooze 3 weeks till (presumably) -rc1 might come out.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>