[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSSK+0afMcpUAKyK@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:00:27 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
kbusch@...nel.org, sagi@...mberg.me, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, avri.altman@....com,
swboyd@...omium.org, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
josef@...icpanda.com, hch@...radead.org, hare@...e.de,
bvanassche@....org, ming.lei@...hat.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
nbd@...er.debian.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] scsi/sr: use blk_cleanup_disk() instead of
put_disk()
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:29:23PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> The single put_disk() is useful if you know you're not doing
> a cleanup after add_disk(), but since we want to add support
> for that, just use the normal form of blk_cleanup_disk() to
> cleanup the queue and put the disk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
.. not needed as the cleanup is done by the core scsi code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists