Message-ID: <c8d7c5e6-a503-3628-f044-a44181fefd47@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:18:48 -0500
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/31] 4.4.282-rc1 review

Hello!

On 8/24/21 12:07 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.282 release.
> There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu 26 Aug 2021 05:07:41 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>          https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-4.4.y&id2=v4.4.281
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sasha

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.4.282-rc1
* git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc']
* git branch: linux-4.4.y
* git commit: a11850845e9394a250678b2ec8b714825343f776
* git describe: v4.4.281-31-ga11850845e93
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.281-31-ga11850845e93

## No regressions (compared to v4.4.281)

## No fixes (compared to v4.4.281)

## Test result summary
total: 41546, pass: 33742, fail: 202, skip: 6656, xfail: 946

## Build Summary
* arm: 97 total, 97 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists