linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpu: fix spelling mistake of cpuhp_thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFgQCTtW1fapRLWwXzWE2Y3903SGeqJbBre=8jZt9NEzPcybkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:11:11 +0800
From:   Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To:     ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Yuan ZhaoXiong <yuanzhaoxiong@...du.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpu: fix spelling mistake of cpuhp_thread_run()

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 2:50 PM Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Pingfan,
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 03:07:07PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > According to the name of cpuhp_should_run(), cpuhp_thread_fun() should
> > be a spelling mistake.
>
> I think cpuhp_thread_fun() is short for "CPU Hotplug thread
> function". It seems correct since the function pointer "thread_fn"
> (short for "Thread function") in the struct "smp_hotplug_thread
> cpuhp_threads" is assigned the value cpuhp_thread_fun().
>
This makes sense to me.

Thank you very much.

Regards,
Pingfan