linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: update keep alive interval when kato is modified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2fc5b98a-b397-3be1-1957-986e8b6aa732@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:51:25 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        sasaki tatsuya <tatsuya6.sasaki@...xia.com>
Cc:     "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: update keep alive interval when kato is modified

On 8/25/21 10:53 AM, hch@....de wrote:
> Any reason we can't just call this from nvme_passthru_end instead
> of inventing a new API?  Right now the nvmet passthrough code never
> uses the underlying keep alive code, so it doesn't make a difference,
> but I expect we'll need more handling for passthrough commands like
> this, and we might also grow more users (e.g. the io_uring based
> passthrough).
> 
Yeah, we'll need that anyway if and when hostid becomes settable.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer