linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] nvme: update keep alive interval when kato is modified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ffa643335a9467ba586450f8820c54a@kioxia.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:27:53 +0000
From:   sasaki tatsuya <tatsuya6.sasaki@...xia.com>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
CC:     "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] nvme: update keep alive interval when kato is modified

> On 8/25/21 10:53 AM, hch@....de wrote:
> > Any reason we can't just call this from nvme_passthru_end instead
> > of inventing a new API?  Right now the nvmet passthrough code never
> > uses the underlying keep alive code, so it doesn't make a difference,
> > but I expect we'll need more handling for passthrough commands like
> > this, and we might also grow more users (e.g. the io_uring based
> > passthrough).
> >
> Yeah, we'll need that anyway if and when hostid becomes settable.

Thanks for your comments. To call nvme_update_keep_alive from
nvme_passthru_end, I think nvme_passthru_end needs an argument of
a pointer to nvme_command. I will try to call it from nvme_passthru_end.
Please correct me, if I am misunderstanding what you mean.

Thanks.