[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210825163516.GM5186@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:35:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "BUG: Invalid wait context" in ls_extirq_set_type
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:54:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No problem with adding raw spinlocks to regmap, I think it's just nobody
> > needed them before. I've not looked at the problem in sufficient detail
> > to figure out if that's actually the best solution here but from an initial
> > pass through it looks reasonableit looks reasonable
> The question becomes how will syscon be told that one of its consumers
> needs the regmap to use raw spinlock locking? The syscon regmap is
> initialized before any of its consumers probe, AFAIU.
I'd expect it to figure this out based on the compatible string for the
syscon device.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists